FAST and Streaming – Professional Essentials from NewscastStudio

Delving into FAST's growth, personalized content and streaming’s influence on traditional broadcasting models.

12

NEWSCASTSTUDIO.COM

13

NEWSCASTSTUDIO.COM

idencing frustration with navigating an ev-

er-expanding array of platform interfaces

and subscriptions.

These findings suggest that the stream-

ing industry’s fixation on growth has fu-

eled saturation. While providers continue

expanding offerings, audiences now de-

sire less choice, not more.

Streamlining options into unified plat-

forms or service bundles may become

imperative to reducing subscriber fatigue.

For example, some platforms like Amazon

Prime Video now offer popular add-ons

integrating other major services. Such

moves acknowledge the market’s maturity

by consolidating consumer access rather

than endlessly fragmenting.

Ad-supported content: Preference

for cost savings

Interestingly, saturation accompanies

growing consumer openness to ad-sup-

ported streaming options.

Per Hub Research, nearly 40% of view-

ers now prefer fewer ads in services. How-

ever, two-thirds also express willingness

to accept ads if they reduce subscription

costs. Compared to just six months ago,

audiences exhibit greater inclination to-

wards ad-supported platforms. This likely

reflects economic pressures tightening

household budgets; streaming viewers to-

day appear largely amenable to ads if they

provide savings.

In response, ad-based models are pro-

liferating through both free, ad-support-

ed TV (FAST) services and ad-supported

tiers on paid platforms. However, research

from Kantar reveals slowing adoption for

both FAST and ad-supported VOD in late

2022, despite aggressive holiday promo-

tions. This suggests that while consumers

accept ads to lower costs, they still prefer

paid subscriptions overall.

Successful ad-supported options will

likely balance modest subscription fees

with limited, non-invasive advertising.

Tailoring to demographics:

Gauging generational preferences

Demographic

nuances

also

shape

streaming’s future.

For example, Gen Z viewers have

emerged as a key streaming segment. Per

Horowitz Research, 70% of Gen Z regular-

ly watches full-length TV on streaming ser-

vices while also consuming high volumes

of short-form video. On average, Gen Z

subscribers access about six platforms

— evidence of still-rising adoption among

younger audiences amidst overall market

saturation.

Providers

are

responding

with

youth-centered offerings, like YouTube’s

continued success across age groups.

However, Gen Z preferences remain in

flux.

According to Kantar, free ad-supported

services are gaining appeal compared to

paid subscriptions. Though, as Gen Z earn-

ings increase over time, willingness to pay

for premium, ad-free tiers may also rise.

Still, the key insight is that audiences have

heterogeneous preferences dictated by

demographic factors like age, income, and

viewing habits. Providers must undertake

granular audience segmentation to tailor

offerings accordingly.

Competition from smart TV: The

living room’s new centerpiece

However, streaming services also in-

creasingly compete with tech develop-

ments beyond their direct control — the

rapid growth of smart TVs.

Parks Associates reveals that only 5% of

U.S. households rely solely on tradition-

al pay TV. Instead, smart TV apps have

emerged as the new living room enter-

tainment hub. Per Hub Research, 32% of

viewers now initiate streaming sessions

through smart TV apps rather than exter-

nal devices.

As smart TV adoption advances, their

onboard streaming apps could disrupt

the competitive landscape. Built-in smart

TV interfaces also offer expanded adver-

tising capabilities — leveraging viewing

data to enable more personalized, target-

ed marketing, for instance. Consequently,

streaming players will likely need to forge

direct partnerships with smart TV manu-

facturers to maintain prime placement on

proprietary platforms.

Interactive and shoppable TV:

New methods of engagement

Speaking of TV advertising, streaming

further propels ongoing experimentation

with interactive and shoppable ad formats

aimed at better-engaging viewers. Per

LG Ad Solutions, over 50% of consumers

express interest in using TVs to directly

purchase products seen in commercials.

Younger demographics like Gen Z are es-

pecially keen to embrace transactional

video ads – popularized overseas through

livestream shopping.

These interactive advertisements rep-

resent untapped potential for streaming

monetization beyond traditional pre-roll

and banner ads. They blur the lines be-

tween entertainment content and retail

shopping, delivering hybrid informational

and transactional experiences.

While still in the early days, such inno-

vations foreshadow TV advertising’s con-

vergence with digital commerce amidst

streaming’s ongoing disruption of conven-

tional television.

A consumer-centric future?

Streaming stands at a decisive cross-

roads.

The era of growth through an ever-ex-

panding glut of platforms is over. We’ve

reached peak saturation; consumers are

overwhelmed by a dizzying array of most-

ly indistinguishable services. Streaming

risks collapsing under its own weight if

companies continue pursuing platform

proliferation and mutually assured disrup-

tion.

Survival now depends on actually listen-

ing to what audiences want: convenience,

control, and affordability.

Providers who resist this consum-

er-centric transition cling to an outdated

mindset that takes viewers for granted.

They wrongly assume having the most to

offer equals market dominance. But atten-

tion is finite.

Streaming can only advance by improv-

ing how viewers interact with content, not

drowning them in excess choice.

The path forward is clear for those will-

ing: consolidate, integrate, simplify. Part-

ner with smart TV ecosystems instead of

confronting them. Make ads less invasive.

Experiment with interactivity and transac-

tions.

Dak Dillon is NewscastStudio’s editor in

chief. Dak has covered broadcast technol-

ogy, engineering and design for over 15

years and has practical experience in the

industry including a Promax Gold Award

and multiple regional Emmy nominations.

Continued from previous page

Streaming services also increasingly compete with

tech developments beyond their direct control

— the rapid growth of smart TVs

In this executive Q&A, Dan Goman, CEO

of Ateliere Creative Technologies, shares

his insights on the evolving landscape of

the

streaming

industry. Amidst

rising streaming

prices,

Goman

discusses

the

potential

long-

term effects on

consumer behav-

ior and industry

dynamics,

high-

lighting the push

towards

more

sustainable, prof-

itable, and pre-

dictable models. 

How do you see

the trend of soaring streaming prices

impacting consumer behavior and

industry dynamics in the long term?

The trend of soaring streaming prices

could impact consumer behavior by po-

tentially driving users towards models

that are more sustainable, profitable, and

predictable for the industry. This shift may

lead to a new monetization model, possi-

bly resembling traditional cable packages.

What are the key drivers pushing the

streaming industry towards higher costs,

and how sustainable is this approach?

Key drivers of higher costs in the

streaming industry include high content

and operating costs, market saturation,

and decreasing revenues from tradition-

al cable and broadcast sources. This ap-

proach aims at creating more sustainable

and profitable models, but its long-term

sustainability is uncertain.

What is your view on streaming bundles?

Streaming bundles are becoming a com-

petitive strategy as they offer a variety of

content in one package, appealing to di-

verse consumer preferences. These bun-

dles may resemble traditional cable pack-

ages, offering a mix of content but may

limit consumer choice to specific bundles

rather than individual preferences.

The transformation of streaming plat-

forms could lead to a model similar to tra-

ditional cable, known as “Cable 2.0,” which

might reduce the flexibility and choice

that are central to the current appeal of

streaming services.

How might gaming change streaming?

Gaming

could

potentially

change

streaming by introducing interactive and

engaging content, leading to new forms

of entertainment and possibly integrating

with traditional streaming services to offer

a more comprehensive entertainment ex-

perience.

From a technology perspective, what

needs do you see arising from your cus-

tomers and endusers?

From a technology perspective, there’s

a need for solutions that facilitate efficient

and cost-effective content management,

distribution, and storage, especially con-

sidering the growing variety and volume of

content.

How do cloud native technologies

contribute to reducing costs and

increasing efficiencies?

Cloud-native technologies contribute to

reducing costs and increasing efficiencies

for studios by offering scalable, flexible,

and resilient solutions for content storage,

management, and distribution. They en-

able studios to handle large content librar-

ies more effectively and adapt to changing

market demands.

Dan Goman is CEO of Ateliere Creative

Technologies.

Ateliere’s Dan Goman on streaming

bundles and rising costs in market

GOMAN

Key drivers of higher

costs in the streaming

industry include high

content and operating

costs, market saturation,

and decreasing revenues

from traditional cable and

broadcast sources.

EXECUTIVE Q&A

Made with Publuu - flipbook maker